Oregon Mother gets probation for home circumcision of her infant son.

Man who gave his girlfriend herpes gets 14 years in jail.

I don’t even know what to say. This kind of shit happens on a daily basis, even when we don’t know about it. Its fucked up beyond words how swiftly and decisively the hammer of justice is swung when the offender is male, but it turns into a light tap with a feather when the offender is female, no matter what the offense.

Multnomah County Circuit Judge Eric Bergstrom told Peterson on Monday that “the reality is you love your children and had absolutely no intent to harm your child.”

See how the judge tells the woman what actually happened? That’s the most public coaching you ever saw in a case like this. In every situation where a woman is accused of committing harm, every step along the way, society’s enablers are there to help the woman go through. Next thing you know, she’ll be on Oprah, another “Survivor”.

Man gives his girlfriend herpes, he gets 14 years.

Woman intentionally lies, cheats and deceives man about child, she gets child support and society’s blessings – watch any Maury or Jerry Springer show about this. Watch how the woman is allowed to get a few shots in, physically or vocally while the man is muzzled. Whether or not the woman is lying, she is always the one who is comforted and the man is always boo’ed.

Society’s distaste of men except as walking ATMs and cannon fodder writ large.

Man faces jail for reading wife’s email

A man in the US faces up to five years in prison for reading his wife’s emails without her permission.

33-year-old Leon Walker says he read his wife Clara’s emails because he suspected her of having an affair with her former husband.

He has been charged under anti-hacking laws aimed at preventing identity theft and the stealing of trade secrets.

Using his wife’s password on a shared laptop, Mr Walker uncovered her alleged affair with her second husband.

Read that last sentence again. They de-emphasize it, but it seems Mr Walker had actually uncovered the affair he had been suspecting. This prosecution is on par with this for high traitor content.

The case raises serious questions about what is, and is not acceptable on shared computers, such as checking a partner’s emails, or social networking accounts.

BULL. FUCKING. SHIT.

All this is about is a woman getting caught out and Uncle Sam running in like the Captain Save-a-Ho he is to save her and make sure the husband is ruined.

This is modern America. Adultery is not illegal, but finding it out is.

Supreme Court rules in favour of pre-nuptial agreement

I hastily clicked the link to see what had brought about this sea change in attitudes among the British divorce industry. If you go back to the last few big-name celebrity/rich person divorces which made the headlines because the man in question REALLY got fucked, they all happened in the UK. Paul McCartney/Heather Mills, anyone?

So I started reading, and it took me a little bit to figure out how exactly a pre-nup could survive in the man-hating divorce courts of the UK. And then I realized… it was the FEMALE with the pre-nup!! Of course! It all made sense.

Remember that Marriage 2.0 is all about wealth transfer, but only from the man to the woman. Transferring wealth from the royal sex to the male is unconscionable in Western divorce culture.

To wit:

The Supreme Court said it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight.

“In the right case” = “When the woman stands to benefit”

Simple as that.

Full article after the break.

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that a pre-nuptial agreement is binding in the case of a German paper company heiress.

Katrin Radmacher’s ex-husband Nicolas Granatino went to the Supreme Court after appeal judges slashed his divorce settlement from more than £5m to £1m.

The Supreme Court said it agreed that in the right case such agreements can have decisive or compelling weight.

The case was seen by lawyers as a test of whether pre-nup agreements were applicable in law in England and Wales.

The justices dismissed Mr Granatino’s appeal by a majority of eight to one.

They said that following their ruling, which was published on the Supreme Court’s website, “it will be natural to infer that parties entering into agreements will intend that effect be given to them”.

‘Upheld fairness’

Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, said the courts would still have the discretion to waive any pre-nup or post-nup agreement, especially when it was unfair to any children of the marriage.

Ms Radmacher, who was present at the Supreme Court for the ruling, said afterwards: “I am really pleased with the ruling but saddened at the four-year process that brought us to this point.

“I am delighted that Britain has upheld fairness. It is important to me that no-one else should have to go through this.”

Nicholas Mostyn QC, representing Mr Granatino, had told the Supreme Court the contract was impermissible because it amounted to a court legislating over pre-nuptial agreements which were not recognised in English law.

Mr Granatino, a French investment banker who became an Oxford University researcher, and his German former wife signed their pre-nup in 1998.

They spent most of their life together in Chelsea, west London, until their divorce in 2007.

Ms Radmacher’s former husband had agreed not to make any claims on her fortune if they split up, but was awarded £5.85m by a High Court judge in 2008.

She challenged that decision and judges at the Court of Appeal agreed that the couple’s pre-nuptial contract should have been taken into account.

The Appeal Court had agreed that Ms Radmacher, thought to be worth £100m, should be protected by the terms of the German marriage contract. Mr Granatino was fighting to get that ruling overturned.

Please turn on JavaScript. Media requires JavaScript to play.

Lord Phillips: “The court should give effect to such an agreement if it is entered into freely”

They slashed his lump sum payment to about £1m. Mr Granatino also received a £2.5m fund for a house, which would return to Ms Radmacher when the younger of their two daughters, aged 10 and seven, reaches 22.

Mr Granatino said being forced to accept the smaller settlement would leave him in financial ruin, and he asked the Supreme Court to reverse the decision.

In a later statement, the mother-of-two said she believed a pre-nuptial agreement was a “natural part of the marriage process”.

She said: “For Nicolas and I, in our homelands – France and Germany – these agreements are entirely normal and routine.

“We made a promise to each other that, if anything went wrong between us, both of us would walk away without making financial claims on each other. The promise made to me was broken.

“I know some people think of pre-nuptial agreements as being unromantic, but for us it was meant to be a way of proving you are marrying only for love.”

Her former husband, who made no public comment after the judgement was handed down, hugged his lawyers before leaving court.

Before the Court of Appeal judgement was handed down, it was understood pre-nuptial agreements were not recognised in English law.

The Law Commission is due to report in 2012 on whether a change in the law should be made to ensure pre-nuptial agreements are fully enforceable.

Women, the morally superior sex (as Republicans and feminists are wont to think)? HAH.

Take a look at this piece of work. Remember that this is on Facebook, not just a private thought in the mind of some young girl. Nope, the whole world knows (and approves) of the girl treating her virginity like some used tampon.

My virginity is last night's used condom!

You may remember I wrote about Howard Raff, the man who killed Virginia Larkin because she was trying to bankrupt him using the child support system. To recap:

Raff said in a videotaped confession that he drove from Arizona to California to kill Larkin. He described walking into the Ukiah law office where she worked in November of last year, shooting her in the head, then turning himself in at the courthouse.

He told jurors the killing was justified because Larkin was trying to bankrupt him. After dodging the court-ordered $200-per-month payments for 22 years, the debt had grown to $85,500 with interest.

“It is incomprehensible to the court how a decision to kill can be motivated by court-ordered child support,” Judge Ronald Brown said at the sentencing.

Now, I’ll just say this – murder is a bad bad thing. What Raff did was not right. However, what the system does to men is not right either. I’m not saying two wrongs make a right – hell, Raff didn’t even target the system that enforced Virginia Larkin’s wishes!

Moving on. Well, apparently Larkin had a grand-daughter, and that little angel paid me a visit! Here’s the comment:

Anonymous said…

I AM VIRGINIA LEE LARKIN’S OLDEST GRANDDAUGHTER! AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT HOWARD RAFF IS A CRUEL TWISTED PHYCOTIC SON OF A BITCH WHO DESERVED EVERYTHING THAT HE GOT! AND FYI YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE ON HERE WHO DONT KNOW THE STORY AND DIDNT GROW UP IN THAT HOUSE HAVE ABSOULOTLEY NO IDEA WHAT KIND OF A TWISTED MAN HE IS! AND IT WAS NOT MY GRANDMOTHER PUSHING FOR THE CHILD SOUPPORT IT WAS THE FUCKING STATE! SO DO YOUR REASEARCH OR GET NEW INFORMANTS AND GET YOUR DAMN SHIT STRAIGHT! AS HER GRANDDAUGHTER WHO SHE RAISED I HAVE TO SAY THAT I AM VERY VERY UPSET WITH THIS PUBLISHING AND I AM GOING TO DO EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO GET THIS TAKEN CARE OF! OH AND TO AL YOU “MEN” OUT THERE QUIT YOUR DAM CRYING AORUND AND HANDLE YOUR BUSSINESS! IF YOU WOULD HAVE KEPT IT IN YOUR PANTS IN THE FIRST PLACE YOU WOULDNT HAVE THIS PROBLEM! IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY EMAIL ME! i would really love to hear what you have to say! WHOEVER WROTE THIS NEEDS TO GET NEW INFORMATION!!!!!!!! MY GRANDMOTHER WAS A VERY KIND LOVING LADY WHO NEVER DID ANYTHING TO ANYONE TO DESERVE WHAT THAT PHYCO DID TO HER! ROT IN HELL HOWARD EUGENE RAFF! YOU DESERVE IT! IF THIS HAD TO DO WITH YOUR FAMILY YOU WOULD SO NOT BEING TALKING SHIT! AND TO WHOM EVER WROTE THIS SO CALLED “STORY” I WOULS LOVE TO HEAR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS! SO EMAIL IF YOU WISH…. amanda_L_87@hotmail.com

What can I say, I bet her grammie was as classy as her! You know what, Amanda, it may just be that Howard Raff was every bit the cruel psychotic son of a bitch you say he was. But I know American women. You just hate men with every fiber of your being. Truth certainly can take a back seat to misandry and it does, every day. Now, there are certainly bad men. Just like there are bad women. You can certainly convince me that Raff was one of those. But I’ve seen countless men’s stories who are just like Raff’s, who just suck it up with no end in sight except death, and watching her get fat with his money. And let me tell you, the ongoing, bureaucrat-stamped theft of a man’s hard earned money by his ex is every bit as soul destroying as rape.

You know what, if grammie was trying to bankrupt him – years, no — decades after her own daughter had grown up and had had children of her own (that’s you, if you’re keeping count), I bet a love and appreciation of men was not on the menu for you growing up. Tell us about yourself — are you yourself the product of a broken home? You’re 23 if I’m not mistaken. Prime age for the slut generation. How many cocks have you had? In the last week? Try not to suck any dick while you’re posting a comment, hon!

I take a woman’s word about a man with a hefty pinch of the proverbial. And that’s an understatement. Women lie. They lie all the fucking time, especially rejoicing in telling lies that ruin men’s lives. All you females think about when you look at a man are how big his wallet is, or how much of an asshole he is. Whatever gives you the most tingles, right? Take care, hon.

Read this sickening shit.

The University of Central Florida has been awarded a $434k grant to develop a video game for tween girls. The game, which is still in development, is apparently designed to allow girls to “practice” rejecting peer pressure from boys for sex and make outs.

It doesn’t say who granted the $434,000. That’s not a trivial sum of money.

Along side UCF’s institute for simulation and training, Professor Anne Norris is creating a virtual game which works by using simulation and digital puppetry. It sounds complicated, but it’s simple technology.

“A boy similar in age might approach the person playing the game and ask her to make out or there might be some sexual innuendo,” said Norris.

Anne Norris. What a fucking cunt. But I’m not blaming her. She’s just following the money. She’s a woman and there’s gotta be a man somewhere bankrolling this.I’m way past thinking this is “accidental” – this kind of orchestration of the marginalizing and cuckolding of an entire population doesn’t come easy and doesn’t come often, but its here and its here right now before our very eyes.

For the rest who are the useful idiots — Hey you fucking dunces, girls aren’t fucking innocent angels in white costumes defiled by evil men for the nefarious purposes of SEX and REPRODUCTION. Girls mature faster, you fucking chucklefucks, and they don’t even do it with guys “similar in age” even when they’re in middle school – they do the whole diggity with boys older than them most of the time. You would see this if your eyes weren’t clouded by hate and a pathological desire to make all women into asexual dykes whom you would rather see munching carpet and setting fire to armpit hair than to see in a wholesome relationship with a boy who isn’t just out to pump and dump them.

Funny how before feminism, millions of girls could keep their fucking panties on.

I saw this article in my feed reader today from the BBC.

Israeli Arab who ‘raped’ a woman says verdict ‘racist’

An Arab man convicted in Israel of rape because he pretended he was a Jew when he had consensual sex with a Jewish woman has called the verdict racist.

Sabbar Kashur, 30, was found guilty of “rape by deception” by the Israeli court and sentenced to 18 months in jail.

According to the complaint filed by the woman, the two met in a Jerusalem street in 2008 and had sex that day.

When she discovered he was not Jewish, but an Arab, she went to the police.

Kashur was arrested and charged with rape and indecent assault, but the charges were later replaced by a different charge of “rape by deception”.

House arrestBut according to Kashur, he did not pretend to be Jewish.

He told reporters that he is known by friends and family by the nickname Dudu, which is more commonly used by Jews called David.

He has been under house arrest for two years, he said.

“If I were Jewish, they wouldn’t have even questioned me,” the Haaretz newspaper quoted him as saying.

“That’s not called rape, I didn’t rape her in the forest and and throw her away naked. She agreed to everything that happened.”

‘Unbearable price’In the court’s ruling the judge, Zvi Segal, wrote: “If she had not thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious relationship, she would not have co-operated.”

“The court is obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price – the sanctity of their bodies and souls,” the court judgement was quoted as reading.

But Kashur says events were different.

“I’d say she set upon me. She was interested in my motorcycle and so we talked. I didn’t pretend.”

‘Problematic’There is a precedent in Israel for criminal charges being brought in such cases.

One man who told women he slept with he was a neurosurgeon in order to impress them was convicted of fraud.

A lawyer with the Public Defenders’ Office said the court had gone too far.

“The test the court used is problematic,” said Elkana Laist.

“Every time a man tells a woman he loves her, based on which she sleeps with him, he could be convicted of rape.”

Kashur’s lawyers say he will appeal against the sentence.

Around 20% of Israel’s population are of Arab descent.

Reminds me a lot of “statutory rape” of which only men seem to get convicted and serve actual time. Women? They just flash their pussy pass.

So here we have a slut who had sex with a guy hours after she met him on the street. And now he’s in jail because she thought he was Jewish. Mind you, this isn’t the first time the Israeli courts are convicting a man of “rape by deception” and it won’t be the last. Human rights? Only for the Royal sex, sorry.

All the while women can lie, cheat and deceive with impunity.

Completely fucked up.

Be careful who you call a misogynist, you misandrist cunt!

Why yes, I added the descriptive word that is associated with feminism and feminists all by myself. Hee hee hee.

An excerpt and why you should go read the whole thing:

It was a feeling of utter futility: someone had decided that I was a bigot, and that was that. All of my subsequent behaviors would likely be seen and judged under that light. The other day I had a feeling uncomfortably reminiscent of that sense of futility, stirred up by again being on the receiving end of a groundless, slanderous accusation. This time, I’m not falsely accused of being racist, but of being sexist.

And the epic conclusion:

What a sad state of affairs for the feminist movement. So there’s my apology, Nagoski. Go stuff it up that hole of yours which is shared by both male and female jackasses alike.

Fuck all that shit, its a well plastered member of the Royal Sex doing the abusin’, I’m just waiting with bated breath for her defenders – fellow holders of the Pussy Pass, hags, feminists and – of course – White Knights whose knee jerk reaction is always “Its the man’s boy’s patriarchy’s fault! It has to be because, see here I’m a man and I’m evil and thus ALL MEN must be evil like me or worse!!!”

Woman on plane plied boy with drugs and alcohol to entice him.

Woman on plane offered 14-year-old boy sex, drugs
From Sun-Times Media
Link..
A Chicago area father is suing Southwest Airlines, alleging his 14-year-old son was forced to sit next to a woman who allegedly made sexual advances toward the boy and offered him illegal drugs during a flight to Florida.

The suit, filed Monday in Cook County Circuit Court, claims that the flight attendants didn’t protect the boy during the July 13th, 2008 flight from Chicago to Orlando.

“My client was a 14-year-old little boy when he was aggressively, sexually pursued by an older passenger who offered him drugs, who wanted sex from him,” said Chicago attorney Jeffrey S. Deutschman.

“He went to the bathroom four times, he asked to move and he was told to take his seat,” Deutschman said.

The boy was so “shaken” he refused to take the return flight home alone, the suit states.

“His father had to fly down and bring him back,” Deutschman said.

The suit claims the airline was negligent and failed to “remove the adult female who was obviously intoxicated and/or under the influence of other drugs.”

A spokesman for Southwest Airlines declined comment.

Who wants to bet that those motherfucking nancy boys in the air hostess uniforms didn’t even care or had a laugh about it? Like in that South Park episode,

“Help, there’s a drunk woman trying to rape me!”

“NIIIICE”