We all remember Jessica Lynch, right? That honorable, courageous, brave woman who practically channeled Rambo and the Terminator in dusty old Iraq … err I mean the lady who didn’t even fire a shot, and got taken care of very well by the Iraqis because she was a member of the Royal Sex.

Well, it appears we have another one. The Army just can’t stop its creative juices from flowing, can it?

That's not how you put foot in mouth!!

Senior Sgt Mark Todd says he fired the bullet that brought the gunman down.

A witness confirmed Sergeant Todd’s account.In the interview, Sergeant Todd said he and Sergeant Munley had pulled up to the scene in separate cars at the same time. He said they began running up a small hill toward the building that held the processing center where unarmed soldiers reported for check-ups and vaccinations before deployment. The gunman was already outside, Sergeant Todd recalled.

“That’s when the bystanders were pointing in his direction,” he said. “And when we popped up, he was standing there, and we shouted our commands — ‘Police, drop your weapons!’ — and he just opened fire on us.”

Sergeant Todd said he was slightly in front of Sergeant Munley on the hill. “Once we took fire, she broke right and I broke left,” he said.

Sergeant Todd said he did not see Sergeant Munley get shot. He said he started to circle around the building, but then backtracked as panicked bystanders told him of the gunman’s movements.

“As it unfolded, I went a different direction and he went a different direction, and we met up in the front of the building,” he said.

Sergeant Todd said he then saw Sergeant Munley on the ground, wounded. He shouted again at the gunman to drop his weapon.

“Once I came around the front of the building, I caught his attention again, started shouting commands, and then he opened up a second time,” Sergeant Todd said. “And that’s when I returned fire, neutralized him and secured him.”

Two things here -

• is this account accurate?
• will the Army let his account stand? Sometimes the truth doesn’t make such a hot story…

I’ve been minding my own business, you know, for the last year or so that I haven’t posted here. I don’t even know how many readers I have anymore, so this might be like a shout out in space.

But holy shit, I just have to say something about what I just read on this forum. And I know that my opinion won’t be a popular one so I won’t even bother commenting there. I’d be probably be called a patriarchical old goat.

Okay, let’s start from the top:

Feeling guilty about messing with a “2 Weeks Till 18″

So I got invited to a hotel party on Friday night. One of my friends uncles was getting married, and invited a bunch of us up for the reception and after party.

There was lots of booze, and LOTS of beautiful girls all around me. So naturally, I was a total horndog by the end of the night.

At around 10pm I saw this girl who kept staring at me. She was in a group of like 3 other girls, and they were all just staring at me and giggling and being weird. So I had a friend (girl) of mine casually go investigate, and she very nonchalantly sidled the group of girls to hear what all the commotion was about.

She then came back to me, and told me “The one in the middle there thinks you’re like the hottest guy shes ever seen.” So at that point I signaled her to come over and talk with me, and we left loud dance floor area to go talk out in the hallway.

I asked her how old she was and she says “2 weeks and ill be 18″

Right away I started frowning in my mind, and tried to wrap up the conversation. She asked if she could have my number, and said.. here give me your number quick and ill call it so you have mine. No chance to give out a fake, so I figured, okay why not.

As the night progresses, I start getting more and more intoxicated, and thusly.. very horny.

I started thinking about the girl in my mind… but kept dismissing it immediatley thinking to myself “No! You’re 25! Shes like 7 years younger then you!”

But then I thought to myself, okay… shes still young. Maybe she just wants to make out for a while because shes bored too. I suppose that would be okay. Obviously at this point, I was just making up excuses, and jusifying this in my own mind.

I seriously couldn’t help myself. She was really cute, and normally, I’m not a boob guy… but she had the most perfect set of boobs I had ever seen in my life. Of all of the girls I had ever fooled around with, or fucked… these were the best. Top notch, A+ boobs.

So I called her. We went out to the car, started making out, she took off her bra and lowered her dress. It was quite a sight to behold. It took absolutely everything I had to stop it there.

I don’t know if she would have gone all the way, but it was certainly heading in that direction.

All in all it was the best 20 – 30 minutes of fooling around with someone, where it DIDN’T lead to sex Ive ever experienced.

And now I feel like a total creep. She’s probably thinking I was 20, maybe 21… but I never told her. She never asked.

She’ll be 18 by the end of the month, but I’m not quite sure thats what is bothering me the most.

I really have no moral obligation to the law, so its not like I really cared that much about breaking it. I think its that I am 25, and she is 18. Thats 7 whole years. Maybe if I were 32, and she were 25, it would be a different story, but alas…. it is what it is.

Now its Monday, and shes already contacting me again. I’ve never wanted to have sex with someone so bad in all my life, but this guilt is driving me crazy.

Anyone ever had a similar experience? Any suggestions on how to proceed?

Now, I’m a total horndog myself and I fully support this guy wanting to get with a hot and horny chick with “the best boobs ever”. Hell, I’d applause them going out and all that good stuff. Why not, right? As long as she’s legal, and there’s no morality in the USA so everything goes. And if it ain’t legal, well the Pussy Pass only works for one gender so keep that pen out of the fresh ink boys!

Let’s move on to a month later.

*Update* We made plans to make this all happen. Although, there was a lot of shit going on in the backround that I was pretty much clueless to.

She informed me of her exact situation. It basically went like this. She has this guy, who is also 18. Who is like the love of her life. He is NOT a virgin… and according to her, she is embarassed by her inexperience.

She basically told me that when she saw me she was immediately attracted to me, and after we messed around for a bit, she saw me as a perfect candidate to teach her a few things.

However, it was made very clear that she was looking for the opposite of what most girls would be seeking in their first mate. She basically told me right out that she wanted her first time to be based on raw lust and physical attraction… and to save the “love making” for this other guy shes known for years.

I must admit, this threw me off a bit… but truthfully, it was the best news I could have ever heard. I have no interest in this girl as an actual partner. I’m just horny. So, we set a date (saturday before last), and went through with it.

I cleaned up the house a bit, and had her come over. No dinner/movie, no candles lit all over the place and rose petals on the bed. It was down to business pretty much right off the bat.

We took it slow, fooled around for about a half hour to get the juices flowing, and I asked her one last time if she was sure she wanted to continue. She was, and we did.

Now, I’ve really only had sex with a handful of girls before, but this was like on a whole nother level. Granted, I’ve never had sex with someone I’ve been in love with, and even though I am certainly not even “in like” with this girl, it was probably the greatest night of my life.

The fact that she needed it to go slow, made it easier for me to last longer. It was far more sensual then I thought it was going to be… and by far the best time I’ve ever had doing the deed. In fact, it was almost a little scary how good it actually was. For a second there I was worried I was gonna become addicted to virgins or something.

I will admit, it was on my mind for a day or two afterwords… and that kind of freaked me out. However, luckily, as of this past weekend I started seeing a girl that I really really care about. Shes beautiful, and thankfully, the same age as me.

It’ll be an experience I wont soon forget… and it was a bit flattering that this girl chose me to be her first based purely on animal lust.

I’m sure something like this won’t happen again, and I’m fine with that. If it does however come up again… there will be no hesitation from me.

Okay, back the fuck up here. Let’s recount:

1. Girl is an 18 year old virgin.

2. Guy is a respectable 25 year old guy. I’m not saying anything to shame the guy at all – he could be a thug and it would be the same. But just for the purposes of this list, he’s a white collar 25 year old guy making his way in the world.

3. They hook up. Guy is not even in college anymore, girl is just out of high school.

4. There is no relationship.

5. Girl sees her virginity as something cheap, worse than worthless, something that could somehow actually make her undesireable to this stooge she’s been playing for the last X years. What in the fuck?!?!

Okay, so I’m completely out of touch with western society. I can’t even fathom a world where I could get together with a girl like this. If I was that other guy, I’d completely cut this fucked in the head woman out of my life. What kind of world do we live in where even a sweet and “innocent” girl actively dives into the hookup culture feet first, in her first sexual experience? What the fuck? Seriously?

Lightening up a little bit, it looks like our dear hero is also falling in love with her youthful nubile charms even though he meant not to. ;•)

Hormones are a powerful thing. Who wants to bet that the girl’s ability to love is damaged by treating her first time as if she were in a teen flick? Sex and love are waaay more closely related than the hookup culture thinks.

Women and children. The two words go together like wine and cheese. Like babbling and brook. Like Micro and Soft (errr I’m thinking about Dr. Phil again, sorry).

Women have been with babies since the beginning of recorded history, and probably since before then. They make themselves useful by having babies, taking care of them until they know where to shit and when to eat. Then, hopefully, the men take charge and make men out of boys. That’s the way its always been, and that’s why a million government programs targeted at babies also end up feeding quite a few women in the process. WIC anyone?

Maybe its time to stop that. Maybe its time we gave out harsher punishments to women who abuse the implicit trust that society places in women wherever a baby is concerned.

Here we have a woman who cooked up a sob story about a missing baby that never existed in the first place, all for her own nefarious ends – to manipulate her ex into coming back to her.

MIAMI, Florida (CNN) — Meagan McCormic faced television cameras on Christmas Day to plead for the return of her missing 5-month-old son.

Meagan McCormic, 22, is charged with filing a false police report about a missing baby.

var CNN_ArticleChanger = new CNN_imageChanger(‘cnnImgChngr’,'/2008/CRIME/12/26/missing.baby.hoax/imgChng/p1-0.init.exclude.html’,1,1);

//CNN.imageChanger.load(‘cnnImgChngr’,'imgChng/p1-0.exclude.html’);

“I don’t even know if he’s dead or alive,” she said.

In fact, she knew that the child had never existed, police said.

McCormic was trying to lure an ex-boyfriend back when she invented a missing-child story that triggered a statewide search this week, police said Friday.

Investigators have charged the 22-year-old with filing a false police report. If convicted, they said, she may have to pay authorities for the cost of their search.

She was scheduled to appear in court Friday afternoon.

McCormic had described her infant son as having a mohawk, a single tooth and a fake tattoo. She told reporters his name was Riley Buchness and that she had left him with a nanny who had a French accent and a gap between her teeth.

She invented the story to lure back an ex-boyfriend by pretending he had fathered a child he did not know about, said Delrish Moss, a spokesman for the Miami Police Department. When the boyfriend showed up and asked to see the child, Moss said, McCormic told him the boy was missing.

“He finally decided to show up, and she created a story and he had no idea,” Moss said.

On Christmas Day, the estranged boyfriend attended a news conference with McCormic under the impression that he had a son who was missing.

“I don’t understand,” John Buchness, 26, said then, choking back tears. “It’s Christmas.”

McCormic told police she had left her son with a nanny named Camille.

“I don’t know if they’re in Florida,” she said. “I don’t know where they are.”

Authorities around Florida started looking for the boy and nanny, using the descriptions McCormic supplied, police said. She even gave police a picture of the boy, but Friday they said they believe she had downloaded the photo from the Internet.

Women lie and lie but no one does anything about it. No matter how many other lives are wasted, how many men get hurt, how much other people’s money gets spent. Meanwhile a man who posts anything about his ex on the internet is arrested at the first chance.

Oh shit. A recently-divorced man dressed up as Santa, went to his ex-wife’s house, shot her entire family that he could see and then set fire to her home using a home-made flamethrower, and then finally shot himself.

Oh shit. The media is going to have a field day with this one.

COVINA, Calif. – Stinging from an acrimonious divorce, a man plotting revenge against his ex-wife dressed up like Santa, went to his former in-laws’ Christmas Eve party and slaughtered at least eight people before killing himself hours later.

Bruce Pardo’s ex-wife and her parents were believed to be among the dead. Investigators planned to return to the scene Friday and sift through the ashes of the home, which Pardo set ablaze using a bizarre homemade device that sprayed flammable liquid.

Pardo, 45, had no criminal record and no history of violence, according to police, but he was angry following last week’s settlement of his divorce after a marriage that lasted barely a year.

“It was not an amicable divorce,” police Lt. Pat Buchanan said.

Pardo chose to exact his revenge at the annual Christmas party his former in-laws held at their two-story home on a cul-de-sac in a quiet Covina neighborhood 25 miles east of Los Angeles.

“Christmases were that special time of the year, it meant so much to them,” Rosa Ordaz, a family friend of the victims, told KCBS-TV.

In past years, a neighbor dressed as Santa Claus and entertained guests. But the neighbor had moved away and there was no Santa — until Pardo arrived around 11:30 p.m.

The massacre began when an 8-year-old girl answered Pardo’s knock at the door. Pardo, carrying what appeared to be a large present, pulled out a handgun and shot her in the face, then began shooting indiscriminately as about 25 partygoers tried to flee, police said at a news conference.

A 16-year-old girl was shot in the back, and a 20-year-old woman broke her ankle when she escaped by jumping from a second-story window. Those two, and the 8-year-old, remained hospitalized Christmas Day. All were expected to recover.

The gift-wrapped box Pardo was carrying actually contained a pressurized homemade device he used to spray a liquid that quickly sent the house up in flames. Police said Pardo had recently worked is the aerospace industry.

David Salgado, a neighbor, said he saw the 8-year-old victim being escorted to an ambulance by four SWAT team members as flames up to 40 feet high consumed the house.

“It was really ugly,” Salgado said.

Another neighbor, Jan Gregory, said she saw a teenage boy flee the home, screaming, “`They shot my family.’”

When the fire was extinguished early Thursday, officers found three charred bodies in the living room area.

“They were met with a scene that was just indescribable,” police Chief Kim Raney said. Investigators found five more bodies amid the ashes later in the day and planned to return Friday to continue looking.

None of the dead or missing has been identified. Authorities were unable to immediately determine whether the victims were killed by the flames or the gunfire.

Following the shootings, Pardo quickly got out of the Santa suit and drove off, witnesses told police. He went to his brother’s home about 25 miles away in the Sylmar area of Los Angeles. No one was home, so Pardo let himself in, police said.

Police were called to the home early Thursday, and officers found Pardo dead of a single bullet to the head. Two handguns were found at the scene, and two more were discovered in the wreckage of his former in-laws’ house.

A car that Pardo apparently parked near his brother’s home exploded Thursday evening and more ammunition was found in it, Los Angeles police Sgt. Francisco Wheeling said. She had no immediate details on what set off the explosion. No one was hurt.

Investigators seeking further information about Pardo’s motives have begun searching his home in the suburban Los Angeles community of Montrose.

Pardo’s next-door neighbor, who did not want her name published to protect her privacy, said he moved in more than a year ago with a woman and a child. She said they kept mostly to themselves and the woman later moved out with the child.

Pardo was often seen walking a dog around the neighborhood and working on his lawn, the neighbor said.

He also served regularly as an usher at evening Mass at Holy Redeemer Catholic Church in Montrose, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Jan Detanna, the head usher at the church, was stunned when told about the violence.

“I’m just — this is shocking,” Detanna told the Times. “He was the nicest guy you could imagine. Always a pleasure to talk to, always a big smile.”

Bong Garcia, another of Pardo’s next-door neighbors, told the Times he saw Pardo between 9 and 10 p.m. Christmas Eve and spoke briefly to him. Pardo told him he was on his way to a Christmas party, Garcia said.

Just for once, I’d like to see a small tiny little bit of discussion on how men are fucked six ways from Sunday in a divorce. Why is it that an “acrimonious” divorce always means “She got the house, the kids, the alimony and child support. He got the bills and the restraining order.”

Women gossip. Everyone accepts that. Women gossip at the office, at the hairdressers, on the way to the mall, and whenever some bitch cuts you off in her big front wheel drive SUV while yakking it up on the cellphone, you know she’s gossiping. Maybe about some celebrity, maybe about her neighbors, maybe about her own husband’s penis size and how he can’t get it up for her 400 lb ass. But you know they gossip.

And they don’t catch flak for it. Any more than birds catch flak for pooping on our cars. Its as if we know that they are mental midgets and can’t be held accountable for little things like ruining someone’s reputation.

But men, oh men are held accountable. Boy oh boy they sure are. Woe betide the man who doesn’t realize that only women have carte blanche to act as they please.

Take this guy for instance. He wrote some bad stuff about his ex-girlfriend on the internet, and now guess what, he’s going to jail.

I read about a few websites a while back where women go exclusively to bitch about their exes. They are encouraged to post photos, call them jerks and worse and spread rumors about them. I forget the name of the biggest, most famous website right now, but maybe a reader can remind me. If I search google I see a woman who wishes she could get her ex “whacked” whatever that means, but I’m guessing it would be illegal if a man had written that. Aren’t thinly veiled death threats illegal in all states? (PS: The typical female removal of responsibility strikes again – she wouldn’t “whack” him herself, but have him whacked.)

Ever heard of a Colorado woman arrested for posting on that website? Heck, even on craigslist? Anyone? Bueller?

Here’s the full story:

After a fight with his girlfriend, J.P. Weichel of Loveland, Colorado thought he could blow off some steam by writing nasty things about his ex on in the “Rants & Raves” section of Craigslist. Maybe that makes him a jerk, but under a Colorado criminal libel law, Weichel faces up to 18 months in prison.

AP: The case began when a woman told Loveland police in December 2007 about postings made about her between November and December 2007. Court records show posts that suggested she traded sexual acts for legal services from her attorney and mentioned a visit from child services because of an injury to her child.

Police obtained search warrants for records from Web sites including Craigslist before identifying Weichel as the suspect. Weichel shares a child with the woman.

Weichel, confronted by detectives at his workplace in August, said he was “just venting,” according to court records.

The Colorado law bans statements “tending to blacken the memory of one who is dead” or that “impeach the honesty, integrity, virtue, or reputation or expose the natural defects of one who is alive.”

We’re not lawyers, but we’re going to assume if you can be prosecuted for badmouthing someone on Craigslist, you’re just as liable for behavior on MySpace, Facebook, a WordPress blog, or anywhere else online. Libel is usually a civil matter, unless you live in one of the handful of states (like Colorado) with a criminal libel statute on the books.

I just saw this piece on the dontmarry forum. Synopsis: A woman who was deeply involved with multiple fathers rights groups now claims that they’re all abusers, every last one of them. Oh, and count among the abusers those who were ever on the receiving end of a restraining order or false accusation of DV.

When dad is just bad

By MINDELLE JACOBS
What’s a conference on domestic violence without fireworks? An American speaker shot off a doozy here yesterday, charging that the leaders of some fathers’ rights groups are abusers who use the organizations as tools to harass women.

“It’s really important that we recognize that they’re gaining traction,” Rita Smith, executive director of the U.S. National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, told an international women’s shelters conference.

In a later interview, Smith said her experience of men working on fathers’ rights is that many of the leaders are abusers or were accused of abuse.

“The agenda, often by the leadership, is to completely undermine women’s rights,” she said. “The ones that are the most dangerous are, in fact, creating safety problems for women and children.”

Many who join such groups aren’t abusive – they just lost a custody battle, Smith said, and are being used.

“Our responsibility is to try to figure out which of those groups are legitimate and which of those groups are simply a way for abusers to continue using the legal system to abuse women.”

Want more fireworks? Here goes. Smith also said domestic abusers who fight for custody in U.S. courts win full custody, joint custody or unsupervised access 70% of the time, regardless of the evidence of the mother.

She attributes it to a court gender bias. “For whatever reason, women are not believed,” she told me. “There’s this myth in the family court system in the U.S. that women lie about abuse to gain custody. There’s been no … evidence to indicate that’s true.”

Advocates and experts are trying to reform the U.S. family court system, she added. “It’s pretty broken.”

Her comments were echoed by speaker Sandra Ramos, who runs a shelter for homeless battered women and children in New Jersey and teaches college students about domestic violence.

Said Ramos: “When I tell my students batterers and child molesters get custody, they go, ‘No, that’s ridiculous.’

“If you have money for a good lawyer, you can win anything.”

Abusers fight for custody as a backlash, to try to regain control and hurt the victims for leaving them, said Ramos.

“Batterers are insecure cowards and bullies,” she added. “The way to hurt (their ex-wives) and not have to pay child support is to get the children.”

Abusive men win custody of their kids in Canada as well, said Jan Reimer, provincial co-ordinator of the Alberta Council of Women’s Shelters. “There’s a feeling that even if a perpetrator is abusing the mom, he doesn’t hurt the child,” she said. “The child is used as a pawn to get at the mother.”

Let’s count our blessings, folks, that the vast majority of custody cases are settled amicably outside court.

So enough about custody battles. There are 800 delegates — mostly women but a few good men — at this week’s conference of shelter workers and they all have incredible stories.

Ece Tuncay, who gave a presentation yesterday, is a clinical psychologist with a shelter in Ankara, Turkey, for female victims of human trafficking. There is another in Istanbul and they are desperately needed because Turkey is a destination country for trafficked women from countries like Russia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and Moldova.

The women are tricked into thinking they’ll work as cooks or cleaners and then forced into prostitution, said Tuncay.

“They are not generally able to escape because a pimp always accompanies them.”

But there are hotlines the women can call and, in a strange twist of fate, Turkish johns sometimes feel sorry for them and call the police to rescue them, added Tuncay.

Her group gets the trafficked women safe housing and counselling. Then, with the help of the International Organization for Migration, the women travel safely home.

Every woman saved is a success story. As Reimer, the prime organizer behind this incredible gathering, commented to the delegates Monday night, shelter workers toil in the middle of a “hurricane of suffering” to keep women alive.

No other profession, she added, sees such a constant reminder of men’s inhumanity to women.

I give the last word to Smith who quipped to the hundreds of shelter workers: “I look forward to the day when we all have something else to do in our lives.”

E-mail Mindy Jacobs at mindy.jacobs@sunmedia.ca.
Letters to the editor should be sent to mailbag@edmsun.com.

You know, this completely underscores how women can lie so easily and utter utter whoppers with consummate ease. Then when they’re caught with it, they get away without so much as a smack on the bum. Lenore Weitzman anyone?

This Rita woman was involved with FRA groups for God knows how long, she was definitely treated with kid gloves, probably set quite a few men on each other for alleged misogyny, and now after all that, she claims that the leaders are all abusers? What in the flying fuck? How can somebody believe this shit? Oh wait, she’s a member of the Royal Sex. The Emperor has no clothes and so on but “the parade must go on”. 

Each woman is a double agent until proven otherwise. I’m not of the view that they are helpless creatures who can’t help but take part in a giant sisterhood where the only bond is to be born with a set of female genitals. Oh no, women like Rita Smith are pure evil.

Sits back and waits for accusations of misogyny to fly. 

You know, if you read my blog or any other MRA blog with any sort of frequency you already know that male life is worth an infinitesimal fraction of any given female’s life. She can be a coked out druggie stripper who accuses some upstanding guys of rape, and its curtains for them – even the government will lie and cheat to support her. Thus was born the term “Nifonged”.

But anyway, this story is interesting to me because of the rampant hypocrisy displayed by the women and the complete lack of punishment they will receive.

PARKLAND, Wash. — A man dressed in woman’s underwear and exposing himself drove up to a Parkland espresso stand three times before one of the baristas threw a cup of boiling water at him, said the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office.

Jamae Feddock, a bikini clad barista at Java Girls, said she first thought the man dressed in women’s underwear and exposing himself was a sick joke, until the man came back several times.

The first time he came to the window Feddock said he was wearing a white bra and white panties and touching himself inappropriately.

Then he came back a second time.

“He has underwear over his face, he’s wearing hot pink panties now and the underwear that he was wearing is over his face and there’s a little peephole so he can see,” Feddock said.

Feddock and another barista were working around 5 a.m. last Thursday when the incident happened. They tried to get a look at the man’s license plate, but that too was covered up with women’s underwear.

When the man came back a third time one of the baristas took a cup of 220 degree water and doused him with it.

“Kylie opened the door and threw boiling hot water on his face and his chest and he said oooh yeah,” Feddock said.

Police agencies around Pierce County said they are seeing more and more incidents of indecent exposure — as more coffee stands open — many with women dressed provocatively — or barely dressed at all.

“I don’t think we can make a quid pro quo there that this is causing the effect, and they certainly don’t deserve that behavior, but we do have some of these stands that have been victimized by these activities,” said Det. Sgt. Jerry Bates a Pierce County Sheriff’s Deputy.

Anyone with information should call the Pierce County Sheriff’s Office.

So get this. Here are a couple of bikini baristas. Who are dressed in, you know, bikinis. Something that can reveal a lot more than women’s underwear depending on the style of underwear we’re talking about. Because its a given that the bikinis will have been selected for maximum display while remaining legal. Let me repeat this for you – the women were dressed just as lewdly as the guy. When women can wear pants, blazers and look as butch and unfeminine as they want, who the fuck is to say that men can’t wear women’s underwear? I’m not going to go out in underwear or a skirt because of the social stigma (understatement of the year) but social stigma is completely different from legality. If these women are dressed in a two-piece, the guy has as much right to be there in his underwear as them. Its the same public area, they’re wearing the same amount of clothing, why is there a double standard in which its A-OK to assault him?

And the guy, when they threw boiling water at him, said “Oh yeah”? Really, am I supposed to fucking believe that? Did they scald the goddamn Kool-Aid jug/man?

So this couple of fucking stripper rejects who are working at a fucking coffee shop get so uptight over a guy who, admittedly, is not the cream of the crop, that they take it upon themselves to throw boiling water at him? On his bare skin?

Let me remind you – the famous coffee that got McDonald’s sued was at 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The water these girls used was at least 212F and that kind of temperature leads to third degree burns easily. Those are the kinds of burns that require skin grafts.

I fervently hope the guy comes forward and sues the bitches and the fucking $5 a cup coffee company they work for. Maybe that would send a message that assaulting people is not on. Oh, who am I kidding. If he comes forward he can look forward to a lifetime on the sexual predators’ registry and will end up getting sued by the stripper rejects for visual harassment or something.

Got this from a post by neotruth over on byrdeye’s blog: Ten Feminist Myths

The Ten Most Common Feminist Myths:

1. Myth: One in four women in college has been the victim of rape or attempted rape.

Fact: This mother of all factoids is based on a fallacious feminist study commissioned by Ms. magazine. The researcher, Mary Koss, hand-picked by hard-line feminist Gloria Steinem, acknowledges that 73 percent of the young women she counted as rape victims were not aware they had been raped. Forty-three percent of them were dating their “attacker” again.

Rape is a uniquely horrible crime. That is why we need sober and responsible research. Women will not be helped by hyperbole and hysteria. Truth is no enemy of compassion, and falsehood is no friend.

(Nara Schoenberg and Sam Roe, “The Making of an Epidemic,” Toledo Blade, October 10, 1993; and Neil Gilbert, “Examining the Facts: Advocacy Research Overstates the Incidence of Data and Acquaintance Rape,” Current Controversies in Family Violence eds. Richard Gelles and Donileen Loseke, Newbury Park, CA.: Sage Publications, 1993, pp.120-132; and Campus Crime and Security, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, 1997. *According to this study, campus police reported 1,310 forcible sex offenses on U.S. campuses in one year. That works out to an average of fewer than one rape per campus.)

2. Myth: Women earn 75 cents for every dollar a man earns.

Fact: The 75 cent figure is terribly misleading. This statistic is a snapshot of all current full-time workers. It does not consider relevant factors like length of time in the workplace, education, occupation, and number of hours worked per week. (The experience gap is particularly large between older men and women in the workplace.) When economists do the proper controls, the so-called gender wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

(Essential reading: Women’s Figures: An Illustrated Guide to the Economic Progress of Women in America, by Diana Furchtgott-Roth and Christine Stolba, published by the Independent Women’s Forum and the American Enterprise Institute, Washington, D.C. 2000.)

3. Myth: 30 percent of emergency room visits by women each year are the result of injuries from domestic violence.

Fact: This incendiary statistic is promoted by gender feminists whose primary goal seems to be to impugn men. Two responsible government studies report that the nationwide figure is closer to one percent. While these studies may have missed some cases of domestic violence, the 30% figure is a wild exaggeration.

(National Center for Health Statistics, National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 Emergency Department Summary , Hyattsville, Maryland, March 1997; and U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Violence-Related Injuries Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments: Washington, D.C., August 1997.)

4. Myth: The phrase “rule of thumb” originated in a man’s right to beat his wife provided the stick was no wider than his thumb.

Fact: This is an urban legend that is still taken seriously by activist law professors and harassment workshoppers. The Oxford English Dictionary has more than twenty citations for phrase “rule of thumb” (the earliest from 1692), but not a single mention of beatings, sticks, or husbands and wives.

(For a definitive debunking of the hoax see Henry Ansgar Kelly, “Rule of Thumb and the Folklaw of the Husband’s Stick,” The Journal of Legal Education, September 1994.)

5. Myth: Women have been shortchanged in medical research.

Fact: The National Institutes of Health and drug companies routinely include women in clinical trials that test for effectiveness of medications. By 1979, over 90% of all NIH-funded trials included women. Beginning in 1985, when the NIH’s National Cancer Center began keeping track of specific cancer funding, it has annually spent more money on breast cancer than any other type of cancer. Currently, women represent over 60% of all subjects in NIH-funded clinical trails.

(Essential reading: Cathy Young and Sally Satel, “The Myth of Gender Bias in Medicine,” Washington, D.C.: The Women’s Freedom Network, 1997.)

6. Myth: Girls have been shortchanged in our gender-biased schools

Fact: No fair-minded person can review the education data and conclude that girls are the have-nots in our schools. Boys are slightly ahead of girls in math and science; girls are dramatically ahead in reading and writing. (The writing skills of 17-year-old boys are at the same level as 14-year- old girls.) Girls get better grades, they have higher aspirations, and they are more likely to go to college.

(See: Trends in Educational Equity of Girls & Women, Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Education, June 2000.)

7. Myth: “Our schools are training grounds for sexual harassment… boys are rarely punished, while girls are taught that it is their role to tolerate this humiliating conduct.”

(National Organization of Women, “Issue Report: Sexual Harassment,” April 1998.)

Fact: “Hostile Hallways,” is the best-known study of harassment in grades 8-11. It was commissioned by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in 1993, and is a favorite of many harassment experts. But this survey revealed that girls are doing almost as much harassing as the boys. According to the study, “85 percent of girls and 76 percent of boys surveyed say they have experienced unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior that interferes with their lives.”

(Four scholars at the University of Michigan did a careful follow-up study of the AAUW data and concluded: “The majority of both genders (53%) described themselves as having been both victim and perpetrator of harassment — that is most students had been harassed and had harassed others.” And these researchers draw the right conclusion: “Our results led us to question the simple perpetrator-victim model…”)(See: American Education Research Journal, Summer 1996.)

8. Myth: Girls suffer a dramatic loss of self-esteem during adolescence.

Fact: This myth of the incredible shrinking girls was started by Carol Gilligan, professor of gender studies at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Gilligan has always enjoyed higher standing among feminist activists and journalists than among academic research psychologists. Scholars who follow the protocols of social science do not accept the reality of an adolescent “crisis” of confidence and “loss of voice.” In 1993, American Psychologist reported the new consensus among researchers in adolescent development: “It is now known that the majority of adolescents of both genders successfully negotiate this developmental period without any major psychological or emotional disorder [and] develop a positive sense of personal identity.”

(Anne C. Petersen et al. “Depression in Adolescence,” American Psychologist February 1993; see also, Daniel Offer, and Kimberly Schonert-Reichl, “Debunking the Myths of Adolescence: Findings from Recent Research,” Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, November 1992.)

9. Myth: Gender is a social construction.

Fact: While environment and socialization do play a significant role in human life, a growing body of research in neuroscience, endocrinology, and psychology over the past 40 years suggests there is a biological basis for many sex differences in aptitudes and preferences. In general, males have better spatial reasoning skills; females better verbal skills. Males are greater risk takers; females are more nurturing.

Of course, this does not mean that women should be prevented from pursuing their goals in any field they choose; what it does suggest is that we should not expect parity in all fields. More women than men will continue to want to stay at home with small children and pursue careers in fields like early childhood education or psychology; men will continue to be over-represented in fields like helicopter mechanics and hydraulic engineering.

Warning: Most gender scholars in our universities have degrees in fields like English or comparative literature–not biology or neuroscience. These self-appointed experts on sexuality are scientifically illiterate. They substitute dogma and propaganda for reasoned scholarship.

(For a review of recent findings on sex differences see a special issue of The Scientific American “Men: The Scientific Truth,” Fall 2000.)

10. Myth: Women’s Studies Departments empowered women and gave them a voice in the academy.

Fact: Women’s Studies empowered a small group of like-minded careerists. They have created an old-girl network that is far more elitist, narrow and closed than any of the old-boy networks they rail against. Vast numbers of moderate or dissident women scholars have been marginalized, excluded and silenced.

(Essential reading: everything by Camille Paglia; Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge–Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies; and Christina Hoff Sommers–Who Stole Feminism? How Women have Betrayed Women)

Two articles posted in quick succession caught my attention recently. Both articles are about marrying and becoming a man-slave to some entitled skank.

First: Shine of super-mum wears off in UK and US.

Second: No kids, no jobs for growing numbers of wives.

Watch the fuck out, because women are looking for an early retirement on your dime.

The first article (Shine of super-mom wears off) talks about how women don’t see the appeal of being a high-powered do-it-all paragon of high-powered careerwoman and caring mother anymore. First of all, let me talk about how its a fucking illusion in the media that women who work at pitiful entry-level and middle management jobs are on some kind of career track.

Sure these chicks are on a career track – but one that they themselves don’t want to continue on because, you see, working is hard!! Yes sir. Working is hard, which is why record numbers of women take themselves out of the workforce with the ease of a bad boy dick plopping out of a liberated skank’s gash. Sorry for the disgusting imagery, its just how I feel about women who work until they snag a man and then decide that they’re done working for a living and want to raise “their kids” on someone else’s dime.

No mention, naturally, of the men who have been working tirelessly in the background. While women were crowing about going to work, while they were crowing about being high-powered executives, while they were crowing about being able to vanquish a man with two words, “sexual harassment,” while they invaded workplaces and made them more and more feminine and pushed men further and further out while adding sex to the workplace, men were working tirelessly in the background.

You know, I keep remembering that Russian women guy while I post this. I think, “Am I really becoming another feminist stooge?” But then I realize that women in the west have no sense of fairness and no sense of family. You give them the opportunity to stay at home doing what they love and impressing upon children the importance of mom, and they claim they are bored and start fucking the poolboy. You give them the chance to get out of the rat race in which the rats inevitably end up dead and crushed under the millions of other rats trying to get ahead, and she claims she sacrificed her career. You think “Yes, maybe she should stay home with the child during its formative years,” and she hatches a plan to get out of the workforce for good. And make you pay twice for it.

She does something in her career or life that’s not even remotely news-worthy, and all of a sudden it needs to be celebrated because a fucking vagina-owner did it.

Western women’s idea of parenting is to drop the kids off at the sitter/daycare/soccer and go to Starbucks/Nails Palace/Mall. For the kids to come home to an empty house, microwave their own meal, while she is out with her other early-retirement friends frittering away their husbands’ money, yakking about how much they hate men.

The second article’s examples are great. They completely show how women are either incapable of dealing with the normal pressures of day-to-day life or how they find a husband to ride on. The first example woman is someone who couldn’t face the extraordinary pressure of earning a living at the same time as living a life. Now, well she’s living high on the hog while her personal slave thinks its so awesome that he has a “traditional” wife. Well, until she gets rid of him and keeps his money and assets and retirement.

This is rich:

Davis says her life isn’t luxurious. “Tuesdays are my laundry day,” she says. “I go grocery shopping on Wednesdays and clean house on Thursdays.” Mondays and Fridays are reserved for appointments and other errands.

But her schedule also allows for charity work and leisure: reading, creative writing and exploring new hobbies, like sewing.

It’s a lifestyle, Davis says, that has made her happier and brought her closer to her husband. “We’re no longer stressed out,” she says; because she takes care of the home, there are virtually no “honey-do” lists to hand over.

I can just imagine her looking at her manicured hands and saying in a plaintive voice, “Like OMG, I’m such a slave! I have do, like, laundry!!” You know what’s my laundry day? Its any damn day of the week where I have an hour and a half that I’m not going anywhere. And if I had a machine in my apartment, it would be any 5 minutes that I can spare to put clothes in the washer, put in detergent and close the damn lid. She makes it sound like such a chore.

Also, no honey-do lists. Yeah right, she definitely ain’t counting all the man-stuff around the house. The dangerous, the disgusting and the scary – “oooh a spider! Quick honey, do!!”

The best part is how their only qualms, their only concerns are about how they’re letting down dead feminists. Dead feminists who were themselves kept women, writing in their New Jersey luxury apartments while being attended to by maids their husband had paid for.

“I worried about gaps in my resume,” she says. And there was something else: “I thought about the feminist movement — all those women who worked so hard so that I could go out and have a good career, and I was kind of saying ‘no thanks.’”

They’re more worried about how they’ll get a job, oops a career when she divorces him, takes his money, sucks him dry and then tells the court to run him through the wringer once every month for the child support. Alimony is going out of style, you see. The latest buzz is exorbitant amounts of child support.

But maybe I’m wrong… maybe I just need to grow up, be a real man and pay for women who may or may not suck my cock. Yeah right!

The rulings are coming to the US from the rest of the feminized world… Now its open season on sperm donors.

Court orders sperm donor to pay child support

The Associated Press
http://www.lcsun-news.com/ci_10055164

SANTA FE — A court battle over whether a sperm donor should pay a higher rate of child support has ended with a ruling that the man is liable because he has taken an active role in raising the children.
Kevin Zoernig had argued he was not required to pay child support because he is a sperm donor and is protected under the state’s Uniform Parentage Act.
But the state Court of Appeals noted in its July 25 opinion that this was not a case involving an anonymous donor or a known donor who provided sperm to a licensed physician under an agreement in which he agreed to have no parental rights.
In this case, Janna Mintz inseminated herself using what the court describes as a “syringe-like implement.”

The court said Thursday that the opinion, as a formal published opinion instead of a memorandum opinion, can be cited as a precedent.
Zoernig agreed in 1994 to donate sperm so that Mintz and her partner at the time, Deborah Mrantz, could have a child. After the couple broke up, Zoernig fathered another child for Mintz, again as a sperm donor.

Zoernig, Mintz and Mrantz had entered into an agreement in 1994 in which the female couple would be the child’s primary custodians. Zoernig would serve as a male role model but not be financially obligated to support the child. Mintz and Zoernig entered into a similar agreement for the second child, born in 1997, court records show.

Although Mintz is the children’s primary custodian, they stay with Zoernig every other weekend during the school year and half the summer. Zoernig, 50, now is married and has three children with his wife.
In February 2000, Mintz sought child support payments from Zoernig. The parties agreed the following year that Zoernig would pay $250 a month in child support, plus $50 a month toward arrears, according to court documents.

In 2004, Mintz filed a motion to raise those payments, saying her financial situation had changed. A state district judge adopted a new rate of $670 a month.
Zoernig turned to the Court of Appeals, challenging his obligation to provide any support as well as the higher rate, since the children were conceived through artificial insemination.
The appellate court said he must pay support for both children.
The court said he “enjoys the rights of parenthood,” and that the agreements entered into prior to conception “that purport to absolve him of his responsibility to pay child support” are not enforceable.

Mintz, who now has a husband, said she is pleased with the ruling.
“The decision represents a big victory for our children because their father will continue to provide support for them,” she said in a statement.
Zoernig said the battle “shows you that people who make well-intended agreements outside of the court system can easily be swept into the court system.”

This is the archetype of an American woman. First she’s in a lesbian relationship and thus needs sperm from a third-party to make a child, then she’s out of the lesbian relationship and needs money from someone else so she uses the child support excuse to fleece a man who had signed contracts with her in good faith, and now she’s married and still wants more money. Meanwhile, the man who wants to provide for his own family is screwed because of this “non-traditional family” witch.

Meanwhile, you have to wonder what “rights” the poor man enjoyed to the child. I have no doubt at all that he was allowed no say whatsoever in the raising of the kids. Rights enjoyed? Maybe he was allowed to tickle their tummy from time to time and had the privilege of babysitting when the lesbo bitch went out to screw around. How do you think she got her husband?

Have no fear, women. There are still plenty of dumb men, manginas and suckers out there for the taking. You might have to search a wee bit harder, but you’ll find yours. Just keep hating men and using them, they will just keep on popping up like a game of Whack the Weasel. After all, men are just weasels, right? How dare they love women and appreciate and cherish them!! It is women’s bounden duty to use their sexuality and men’s good nature to exploit men as much as they possibly can.

What a sucker, right? Believing that he could trust a woman’s word. Hahahah he sure got what was coming to him huh.