Pete Patriarch’s Musings

August 19, 2007

For Single Guys

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 9:57 pm

An excellent post by uzemandluzem… about how western women are sluts…

from Unhooked:
“Stepp follows three high school girls and six college women through a year in their lives, chronicling their sexual behavior. These girls and women don’t date, don’t develop long-term relationships or even short, serious ones — instead, they “hook up.” Hooking up, Stepp writes, “isn’t exactly anything.” It can “consist entirely of one kiss, or it can involve fondling, oral sex, anal sex, intercourse or any combination of those things.”

As I stated in another thread, “The real and not often recognized root of women’s power in our society is that 90% of them are really only truly interested in 5% of guys. Just as importantly, when these girls are young (under 30) they’d much rather share the 5% than have one of the 95% all to themselves.”
Obviously, it can only be a best guess but I would breakdown the 5% as follows:
Players: 2%
Bad Boys: 2%
Good players are smooth talkers so they generally do well in clubs. While they do get plenty of sex, its not necessarily easy sex because they still have to make the effort and encounter lots of rejection. While they do have many more one night stands than the average guy, most of the time they still have to take the girl on at least one date before they get any action.
As for bad boys, women perceive them to be very masculine, adventurous and dangerous – and when dealing with the shallow, arrogant creature that is WW, perception is reality. If a bad boy isn’t a smooth talker then he won’t get laid like crazy but like rich dudes, he will always have a girlfriend because girls tend to be drawn to them like stink on shit.
The Studs however, are the true chosen ones: they get easy sex and lots of sex because they have the package (like the bad boys) and the skill (like the players) that allows them to bypass the whole dating scam – I mean scene. The classic example of the stud is the hi school or college quarterback. The following are just a few of the characteristics of the stud:
He has lots of female friends (and many of these girls have borefriends) and he is the king of the “one thing just led to another” hookup – No need to get numbers and certainly no need to waste time or money “dating”.
For example, as the article above alludes to:
He’ll be just hanging out watching a movie with 2 girls and the next thing you know (ATNTYK) he’s piling both of them
He’ll be studying with a girl at a library ATNTYK they’re fucking under the stairwell
He’ll go to a party ATNTYK a girl’s blowing him while her bf’s in the other room
He’ll go to a club with his buddies ATNTYK he’s fucking a girl in the bathroom
He’ll give a girl a ride home from work ATNTYK he’s riding her in the back seat or
He’ll meet a girl on the street ATNTYK he’s on her sofa with her ankles pinned behind her ears like bugs bunny.
Of course, the distinction between players, bad boys and studs is not black and white but the important thing to remember is that women are really only truly interested in the studs and the bad boys. They are entertained by players and the good ones do get lots of action but mainly because there are not enough bad boys and studs to go around – despite the fact that they do their best to spread their seed.
So what about the other 95% of guys?
As far as WW are concerned they are worker bees and sexual drones. In other words, WW simply are NOT INTERESTED IN 95% OF MEN. Instinctively, your gut has been telling you that and your gut has been 100% right as the article above proves.
It proves it because you can only be “casually hooking up” with these whores if you are already in their circle. Women operate in cliques and they only let the studs and bad boys into their cliques because they are the only guys that they are really interested in. For everyone else, including the players, they make it extremely difficult just to talk to them. This is not an accident.
The players and rich dudes are third and fourth in line but they are still made to jump through hoops (i.e. do the dating thing) whereas the studs and bad boys get the “advance straight to pussy – no need to ask for my number and no need to take me on a date” pass.
To Summarize
For non gold digging woman their genuine preference in men before they are ready to get married is as follows:
First Choice: The Stud
Second Choice: The Bad Boy
Third Choice: The Player
Fourth Choice: The Rich Guy (he can provide material excitement)
Fifth Choice: The Catch (good looks, right family & fast track career)
Last Resort: The Average Joe (who in reality is far more of a “catch” than the average WW)
When WW are ready to get married the key thing to remember is that their preferences stay the same but their choices change. So even the non gold diggers will try and get a rich guy or a catch. Since there are not enough of those men to go around they will begrudgingly settle for an average Joe.
And therein lies part of the reason why the typical wife is so angry. She is deeply resentful that she wasn’t able to land a meal ticket and retirement plan so payback comes by cutting her hair, ballooning into a beached whale, making her husband’s life as miserable as possible and of course (in 75% of the cases) the coup de grace, eventually divorcing his ass and cleaning him out.
Of course, we can’t forget that if she thinks she can get away with it she will try and find a stud, a bad boy or a player to knock her up and have the sucker (the rich guy, the catch or the average Joe) raise it.
The irony is that even if a WW can land a rich guy or a catch, in her shallow, arrogant, twisted and entitled little mind, she still will not be happy because to her, such men are not really men, they are personal slaves – suckers, just like the average Joe – only a lot more useful.
Always remember that a western woman’s “heart” will always be reserved for the studs and the bad boys.
To summarize:
WW love Studs & Bad Boys (to the extent that WW are even capable of loving)
They respect players (women only fuck guys they respect**)
They use (while resenting) rich guys and catches & (most disturbingly)
They contemptuously think of average Joes as last resorts
Since bad boys and studs are born not made, unless you’ve always been getting tonnes of easy pussy while rarely spending a dime, the only self respecting option – aside from opting out from dealing with WW completely – is to (learn to) be a master player.
Uzem & Luzem
**hopefully by now, having the “respect” of WW means about as much to you as having the respect of a vulture or a rat – it only matters if you want to fuck them.



  1. Sounds about right. This is one of the unintended benefits (for men) of feminism, in my opinion. In the past, everyone had pressure on all sides to get married young, and one had to face the hard reality of matching up based on “fair market value”. Sevens matched up with other sevens, threes with threes, etc. While that may seem “fair” on the outside, it made for many unhappy, unsatisfied wives who took it out on their husbands. They knew, based on the men hitting on them in grocery stores etc that they could pull the attention of richer, more attractive men (albeit not many that would stick around for 5 min after they got what they wanted). Now, women are free to chase after what they really want, which is to fight among themselves for the top 10 percent or so. Free to follow their base animal urges to get knocked up by one of the alpha males, like most other species do. And as anyone who has witnessed a group of frat boys on the prowl, a 9 male will make do with anything from grades 1 thru 10 on a slow night.

    Why is this a benefit to men? Well, since women have no incentive to face reality until their early thirties when everything starts going south and it’s panic time, they spend their youth happily hooking up with a succession of “the best of the best” taking turns with a small percentage of the male population. They will let you know in no uncertain terms where you stand in the pecking order. If you’re in the chosen few, hey, have fun and use the hell out of them. That’s what they want. If you’re in the “untouchable loser” category (ie the bottom 90%), there’s no need to be discouraged. In the past you would’ve been one of the miserable husbands that just wanted OUT to taste a little freedom. There’s no use pining away for something (everlasting love and commitment and all that rot) that was never available to you in the first place.

    It sounds crazy to young men in their teens to late 20s (I never would have believed it with my hormone-addled brain) but once you hit 30 or so everything calms down, and if you made it through unscathed you’re a lucky man indeed. You’ll find yourself at an Applebees, looking around at the angry, frustrated married women that you don’t have to put up with. When going to the mall for running shoes, you’ll look around at the 95% of stores filled with utterly useless crap and rejoice that you will never have to pay for any of it. You’ll notice your married co-workers that look like the walking dead, that stick around at work because they have to get at least 10 hours of overtime a week just to squeak by, and they don’t particularly want to go home anyway.

    You still have to be on guard, though. Even if your “lower 90% stink” repels them internally, you can still give women other things they want. Like someone to pay the bills for their 15-year-long party, to help raise their assortment of kids (that they had with men they actually wanted), and someone to blame for everything that goes wrong in their lives. The women of the western world let you know early on where you stand, remember that when they start trying to manipulate you to give them something they want.

    Comment by jake (32) — August 21, 2007 @ 11:59 am

  2. Another good post by Uzem, thanks Pete for passing it along to us.

    I’m not sure I agree with his statement near the end about learning to be a master player… if you’ve got to do that, you’ve already lost the game, in my opinion. It’s not a “self respecting option” to me, it indicates a lack of respect for yourself if you feel the need to mold yourself into something else just to deal with women.

    I dunno, maybe I’m reading too much into it, and I’d like to make it clear that this is not an attack, I really enjoyed the read overall.

    Other than the aforementioned point, dead on, I like what this guy has to say the majority of the time. Keep it up.

    Comment by B.R. — August 21, 2007 @ 1:25 pm

  3. On a side note, check this crap out:

    I find the prevalence of such PC/mangina mentalities out there to be rather depressing, crops up all over the place.

    Seems to be the way things are going; thinking for yourself is seen as a dangerous liability in this day and age. Sorry for going OT, just wanted to point it out to you, Pete, in case it interests you.

    Comment by B.R. — August 21, 2007 @ 3:43 pm

  4. “I’m not sure I agree with his statement near the end about learning to be a master player… if you’ve got to do that, you’ve already lost the game, in my opinion. It’s not a “self respecting option” to me, it indicates a lack of respect for yourself if you feel the need to mold yourself into something else just to deal with women.”

    My 2 cents…

    In general, women care about a man’s status, posessions, appearance and personality in that order. The one thing that is missing from that list that any good person would care about but that women in general, don’t give a shit about is character. In fact, you could argue that that is one of the very first lessons in mastering the game.

    In other words, there is no need whatsoever to mold or change the very essence of you (i.e. your character) to get women because WW simply don’t care about it. Since it is impossible to have a successful long term relationship with someone who has no use for character by definition WW are unsuitable for anything more than sports fucking.

    So by “mastering the game” you are not changing your core or anything else that is really important about you because again – women don’t really give a shit about men, they just care about what men can do for them. Mastering the game simply means seeing women with ruthless clarity – the way they really are rather than what they or society would like us to beleive – and then adjusting your attitude, actions and conversation to maximize your chances of success in terms of picking them up and sleeping with them.

    It’s not the strongest who survive and are successful, it’s the most adaptable so its up to us to deindoctrinate ourselves from the brainwashing that we received about the nature of women. The men who manage to do so and who are at least decent looking stand the best chance of having a great sex life because they will be treating women the way they really want to be treated rather than the way they think they want to be treated (or the way that women say they want to be treated).

    In summary, because WW are such monstrously shallow creatures who don’t give a shit about a man’s character, mastering the game of women for the sole purpose of sports fucking in no way requires a man to mold or change the essence of himself (i.e. his character).

    Uzem & Luzem

    Comment by Uzem & Luzem — August 21, 2007 @ 11:42 pm

  5. Thanks for dropping by, Uzem. The PUA scene is very interesting, I wish I’d come across it sooner.

    B.R. – that forum requires registration, could you copy and paste what you saw?

    Comment by Pete — August 22, 2007 @ 8:20 am

  6. Sorry Pete, my bad. I did not realize that registration was required. It’s not that big a deal in any case , it’s simply yet another example of political correctness and its attendant bitch/mangina mentalities in action (mostly manginas, since it is a forum for gamers, particularly those playing tabletop games, which is a mostly male hobby, and thus the few females involved get pandered to and treated like royalty by everyone else.).

    It was basically about a guy who wants advice on how to deal with a friend of his who had said “No bitches at the table (in the group, basically)” in response to the proposal that he might be having one or more female gamers join up.

    It prompted a huge shitstorm of foaming-at-the-mouth manginas and a few of the chicks they worship, posting about how he should just “kick the pig to the curb” and so on (this is a friend that he’s known for years). I found some of their comments to be interesting in terms of how feminine, or just plain twisted, the thought processes of some of those guys had become. Some were articulate enough, but would just say something completely wrongheaded as a conclusion (one even posted a link to a feminist blog in order to “educate” another poster). Others simply used backwards or spurious logic in general, and lashed out harshly at anyone who was claiming that those upholding Political Correctness were overreacting, etc.

    There were a few guys there who had obviously “unplugged” from the fematrix, as the saying goes, but they were viciously attacked, put on ignore lists, etc., by the rather reactionary “Captain Save-a-Ho” types who just didn’t want to hear it.

    That sort of thing tends to happen a lot on message boards, I was noticing in general, where if anything related to gender issues or political correctness comes up, it just snowballs, the original topic or question is usually forgotten, and the ultra-PC guys just go apeshit on anyone who disagrees, it’s quite funny in some ways. I guess it’s just business as usual these days, though. A few guys wake up, and you see it happening in discussions like that, but most are fast asleep at the wheel.

    Side note: the thread got to over 100 pages in length. That’s fairly typical of that type of thing, I’ve noticed. A lot of garbage and repetition, though.

    Comment by B.R. — August 22, 2007 @ 12:30 pm

  7. @Uzem:

    Thanks for clarifying that point for me Uzem, I hear what you’re saying now. It’s important to me that I don’t sacrifice or compromise the essence of myself, as you put it, for women or anyone else, so it’s good to hear your explanation about that.

    I don’t think I’ll ever be any kind of a “player” type of guy myself. I’m just not suited to it (I’m one of those that doesn’t fall into the “at least decent looking” category, partially due to an old injury, partially more common factors), but I can respect where you’re coming from.

    I definitely learned a lot of those lessons about women the hard way, but I think that’s why the posts of yours that Pete has put up over here always make so much sense to me overall, heh. I’ve just seen so many of those clues in front of me, but with more limited experiences for my own part, so I saw, but wasn’t always able to articulate what I observed going on.

    One issue that I had was my extreme tendency towards bluntness and honesty, whether or not someone wanted to hear it, which was the last thing the women I dealt with really wanted. One even came out and admitted that she was used to constant compliments and reassurance, and basically wanted to be lied to, and she was angry with me for not doing so.

    Another one insisted that she wasn’t ready for anything physical, then actually grew angry with me for respecting her wishes (I found out later that she basically wanted me to date-rape her, gotta love how women expect us to risk jailtime so that they don’t have to take responsibility for anything).

    The list goes on. My reaction to all the BS, double standards, and emotional abuse (one basically did to me what I considered to be the emotional equivalent of rape, and horribly abused my trust as well), was to “opt out” as you mentioned in your post as one option. I just stopped dealing with them, and with many people in general, for years, pretty much kept to myself. My health got worse, then I got wrapped up in dealing with that, and so it continued in that vein.

    Things are getting better these days, though still rocky. I’m treating myself better, doing more stuff that I care about, worrying less about what I don’t have, and seeing the foolery of others for what it is, without letting it get to me as much as it once did. I still don’t know if I’ll experience much of the sexual side of things in life, and “sexual liberation” seems to be a female-only prerogative as far as most are concerned. Sometimes I still get angry about the past too, but it passes.

    Anyway, sorry to ramble on like that. Just wanted to say, thanks guys, for doing what you do. It helps guys like me to know that there are others out there who are operating without blinders on, I guess that’s the bottom line.
    I’m no activist, but I try to live my life in a way that I can retain my self-respect, be myself, and not let the BS of life in our society drag me down.

    Comment by B.R. — August 22, 2007 @ 1:01 pm

  8. I wish you well B.R. It’s not easy opting out but it sure as hell must beat being in a lousy marriage or getting cleaned out in divorce court.

    “Sometimes I still get angry about the past too, but it passes.”

    Don’t repress the anger – make sure you have a release. IMO, there is not enough anger in the MRA movement and I’m still trying to figure out why.
    Are men afraid of appearing bitter? Do most MGTOW still not fully realize just how monstrously evil women are?

    If you haven’t heard of or read any of Duncan Idaho’s blog I strongly recommend that you download the PDF. He’s angry like me and he writes very well. You can download his entire blog here:

    Scroll down until you see Censored MRA Blogs on the right and click on The Eternal Bachelor PDF Archives.

    God Bless

    Comment by Uzem & Luzem — August 22, 2007 @ 8:05 pm

  9. “There were a few guys there who had obviously “unplugged” from the fematrix, as the saying goes, but they were viciously attacked, put on ignore lists, etc., by the rather reactionary “Captain Save-a-Ho” types who just didn’t want to hear it.”

    Don’t worry, most of those Defenders Of Women and Captain Save-a-Hos will get what’s coming to them form the very creatures they so staunchly defend.
    A miserable marriage and a vicious divorce will be their just reward.

    Comment by Uzem & Luzem — August 22, 2007 @ 8:09 pm

  10. Thanks for the good wishes, I appreciate it, and the advice.

    No worries, I’ve read Duncan Idaho’s blog for a couple of years actually, and was quite sorry when he shut it down, though I understand his reasons for doing so.

    He’s definitely a good writer, knows how to get his points across well, and I felt like he and I were on the same wavelength on a lot of things. It was also good to hear from someone pretty much the same age as I am, coming to a lot of similar conclusions, despite living in different countries (UK and US). There are some pretty strong parallels regarding what is happening in various western countries, it seems like.

    Comment by B.R. — August 23, 2007 @ 8:56 am

  11. #1 Jake you nailed my thoughts almost precisely!

    One thing I would add is that contrary to the female critics of feminism who claim it has been a good deal for men, that simply isn’t true. It has enhanced the position of the alpha males who now can fuck around without any responsibility (she has the career, let her pay for the abortion), while the rest of us not only aren’t getting any, but now have to compete in the job market with single women who won’t even acknowledge us and married women with husbands making six figures or more. They work for a second home in the Bahamas while we have to starve to death–as a matter of government policy no less!

    I’ve been hanging on to the bottom of the career ladder all my life. I did all the right things: college, grad school, no drugs or diseases or “drama”, bought a home, but it wasn’t good enough for cunts who could now have all that themselves.

    As I got older it actually got harder. Think about it: the process is really one of self-selection, with those girls who want marriage and children ready to make compromises earlier in life. Thus what’s left over have either entirely unrealistic expectations or simply don’t want to get married (as is their right too).

    I am not bitter about my situation to the extent that it was an outcome of the marketplace. I am bitter because the outcome was fixed by policy.

    Comment by sestamibi — August 30, 2007 @ 8:21 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: