Pete Patriarch’s Musings

July 29, 2010

Starting them off young

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 10:57 pm

I just read this on Engadget… Motion-capture game teaches tween girls to avoid come-ons of boys.

Read this sickening shit.

The University of Central Florida has been awarded a $434k grant to develop a video game for tween girls. The game, which is still in development, is apparently designed to allow girls to “practice” rejecting peer pressure from boys for sex and make outs.

It doesn’t say who granted the $434,000. That’s not a trivial sum of money.

Along side UCF’s institute for simulation and training, Professor Anne Norris is creating a virtual game which works by using simulation and digital puppetry. It sounds complicated, but it’s simple technology.

“A boy similar in age might approach the person playing the game and ask her to make out or there might be some sexual innuendo,” said Norris.

Anne Norris. What a fucking cunt. But I’m not blaming her. She’s just following the money. She’s a woman and there’s gotta be a man somewhere bankrolling this.I’m way past thinking this is “accidental” – this kind of orchestration of the marginalizing and cuckolding of an entire population doesn’t come easy and doesn’t come often, but its here and its here right now before our very eyes.

For the rest who are the useful idiots — Hey you fucking dunces, girls aren’t fucking innocent angels in white costumes defiled by evil men for the nefarious purposes of SEX and REPRODUCTION. Girls mature faster, you fucking chucklefucks, and they don’t even do it with guys “similar in age” even when they’re in middle school – they do the whole diggity with boys older than them most of the time. You would see this if your eyes weren’t clouded by hate and a pathological desire to make all women into asexual dykes whom you would rather see munching carpet and setting fire to armpit hair than to see in a wholesome relationship with a boy who isn’t just out to pump and dump them.

Funny how before feminism, millions of girls could keep their fucking panties on.

July 21, 2010

The Patriarchy – saving women from themselves since… forever

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 10:50 am

I saw this article in my feed reader today from the BBC.

Israeli Arab who ‘raped’ a woman says verdict ‘racist’

An Arab man convicted in Israel of rape because he pretended he was a Jew when he had consensual sex with a Jewish woman has called the verdict racist.

Sabbar Kashur, 30, was found guilty of “rape by deception” by the Israeli court and sentenced to 18 months in jail.

According to the complaint filed by the woman, the two met in a Jerusalem street in 2008 and had sex that day.

When she discovered he was not Jewish, but an Arab, she went to the police.

Kashur was arrested and charged with rape and indecent assault, but the charges were later replaced by a different charge of “rape by deception”.

House arrestBut according to Kashur, he did not pretend to be Jewish.

He told reporters that he is known by friends and family by the nickname Dudu, which is more commonly used by Jews called David.

He has been under house arrest for two years, he said.

“If I were Jewish, they wouldn’t have even questioned me,” the Haaretz newspaper quoted him as saying.

“That’s not called rape, I didn’t rape her in the forest and and throw her away naked. She agreed to everything that happened.”

‘Unbearable price’In the court’s ruling the judge, Zvi Segal, wrote: “If she had not thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious relationship, she would not have co-operated.”

“The court is obliged to protect the public interest from sophisticated, smooth-tongued criminals who can deceive innocent victims at an unbearable price – the sanctity of their bodies and souls,” the court judgement was quoted as reading.

But Kashur says events were different.

“I’d say she set upon me. She was interested in my motorcycle and so we talked. I didn’t pretend.”

‘Problematic’There is a precedent in Israel for criminal charges being brought in such cases.

One man who told women he slept with he was a neurosurgeon in order to impress them was convicted of fraud.

A lawyer with the Public Defenders’ Office said the court had gone too far.

“The test the court used is problematic,” said Elkana Laist.

“Every time a man tells a woman he loves her, based on which she sleeps with him, he could be convicted of rape.”

Kashur’s lawyers say he will appeal against the sentence.

Around 20% of Israel’s population are of Arab descent.

Reminds me a lot of “statutory rape” of which only men seem to get convicted and serve actual time. Women? They just flash their pussy pass.

So here we have a slut who had sex with a guy hours after she met him on the street. And now he’s in jail because she thought he was Jewish. Mind you, this isn’t the first time the Israeli courts are convicting a man of “rape by deception” and it won’t be the last. Human rights? Only for the Royal sex, sorry.

All the while women can lie, cheat and deceive with impunity.

Completely fucked up.

July 15, 2010

A beautiful counter-feminist article in the Scientific American

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 10:23 pm

Oh my God, this is simply amazing. Susan Faludi, eat your heart out, because this is the backlash.

Be careful who you call a misogynist, you misandrist cunt!

Why yes, I added the descriptive word that is associated with feminism and feminists all by myself. Hee hee hee.

An excerpt and why you should go read the whole thing:

It was a feeling of utter futility: someone had decided that I was a bigot, and that was that. All of my subsequent behaviors would likely be seen and judged under that light. The other day I had a feeling uncomfortably reminiscent of that sense of futility, stirred up by again being on the receiving end of a groundless, slanderous accusation. This time, I’m not falsely accused of being racist, but of being sexist.

And the epic conclusion:

What a sad state of affairs for the feminist movement. So there’s my apology, Nagoski. Go stuff it up that hole of yours which is shared by both male and female jackasses alike.

Yet another woman abuses child on plane, this time sexually

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 10:13 pm

Where is the outraged response? Where is the new BA policy that women must not be seated next to children? It ain’t the first time a woman has been a cunt towards a child on a plane – Woman physically abusive to child on flight.

Fuck all that shit, its a well plastered member of the Royal Sex doing the abusin’, I’m just waiting with bated breath for her defenders – fellow holders of the Pussy Pass, hags, feminists and – of course – White Knights whose knee jerk reaction is always “Its the man’s boy’s patriarchy’s fault! It has to be because, see here I’m a man and I’m evil and thus ALL MEN must be evil like me or worse!!!”

Woman on plane plied boy with drugs and alcohol to entice him.

Woman on plane offered 14-year-old boy sex, drugs
From Sun-Times Media
A Chicago area father is suing Southwest Airlines, alleging his 14-year-old son was forced to sit next to a woman who allegedly made sexual advances toward the boy and offered him illegal drugs during a flight to Florida.

The suit, filed Monday in Cook County Circuit Court, claims that the flight attendants didn’t protect the boy during the July 13th, 2008 flight from Chicago to Orlando.

“My client was a 14-year-old little boy when he was aggressively, sexually pursued by an older passenger who offered him drugs, who wanted sex from him,” said Chicago attorney Jeffrey S. Deutschman.

“He went to the bathroom four times, he asked to move and he was told to take his seat,” Deutschman said.

The boy was so “shaken” he refused to take the return flight home alone, the suit states.

“His father had to fly down and bring him back,” Deutschman said.

The suit claims the airline was negligent and failed to “remove the adult female who was obviously intoxicated and/or under the influence of other drugs.”

A spokesman for Southwest Airlines declined comment.

Who wants to bet that those motherfucking nancy boys in the air hostess uniforms didn’t even care or had a laugh about it? Like in that South Park episode,

“Help, there’s a drunk woman trying to rape me!”


Male Contraceptives – here we go again.

Filed under: Uncategorized — Pete @ 11:35 am

It seems like every few weeks, there’s an article about another contraceptive pill for men.

Funny how nothing ever comes of it and how even though feminist pharma haters moan about how big pharma caters to men only, with the prime examples being Viagra and Rogaine.So what is it ladies? What is stopping big pharma from making a few big bucks off of a contraceptive pill for men? Imagine that, they could even market it with a ready-made slogan:


We still don’t have a male contraceptive on the market while women have oodles of options. Up to and including abortion – which, let’s face the facts, is basically counted as murder if someone else does it. Hooray for double standards. Or how about their other option, abandonment? Its A-OK if women do it! Or even adoption without the father’s consent? Basically anything goes because children are seen as women’s property in the eyes of our society.

Male Contraceptive Pill Shows Promise –
by Robert Franklin, Esq. on Jul 15, 2010 6:29 AM

This article reports on a new male birth control pill that’s currently in animal studies, but is scheduled to begin human trials in the U.S. next year (Telegraph, 6/28/10).  It was developed in Israel by Professor Haim Breitbart.
It’s a revolutionary concept in several ways.  First, it removes a protein in sperm cells that makes it impossible for them to fertilize an egg.  So it doesn’t have any of the odious side-effects of hormonal contraception, vasectomy or methods that block the vas deferens.  One of those side-effects of hormonal contraception is dramatically reduced libido which few men would find attractive.  And, at least in laboratory animals, the low-dosage pill lasts for one month and the higher-dosage pill lasts up to three months.
All in all, at this point the new pill looks like a breakthrough.  It would seem to be 100% effective, probably inexpensive, easy to use and with no side-effects.  It’s hard to argue with any of that.
It’s also hard to argue with finally (finally!) giving men some control over their own fertility.  For 50 years, women in this country have had access to fairly cheap, extremely effective contraception that suppresses ovulation.  Over the years, they’ve also had access to a bewildering array of IUDs, post-coitus interventions and abortion, in addition to the usual condoms and just plain abstinence.
Men’s contraceptive choices have been much, much more limited.  Essentially, they can abstain from sex, get a vasectomy or use a condom.  Of those three, the only one that can be chosen in private is vasectomy, which, because it’s expensive and surgical, is not an option for most men, particularly young ones.
But a pill, particularly if it has all the benefits touted for the one developed by Breitbart, will fix all of that.  If this one is as good as it’s made out to be, in the not too distant future, men will at last be able to control their own fertility cheaply, effectively and confidentially.
Now, what we know about the pill for women is that, while it can provide almost complete control over their fertility, unfortunately it has to be used – and used correctly – in order for it to work.  And in an alarming number of cases, it isn’t.  That’s the conclusion of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy that reports here that some 50% of all pregnancies in the U.S. are unplanned.  To put it mildly, if there are that many unplanned pregnancies, women aren’t using the wide range of contraceptive options at their disposal.
And the same paper finds, based on research by Child Trends, that children resulting from unplanned pregnancies are far more likely to experience high parental conflict and breakup than are those who are planned.  In short, the failure to use contraception and use it properly results in unwanted children born into high-conflict households.  There’s nothing about that that’s good.
The remarkable fact is that, when young people are interviewed, they very often say that they don’t want children yet, but are using no form of contraception.  Needless to say, that doesn’t make sense, but it seems to be common practice.
Assuming this pill is as good as it says it is, that it’s on the market soon and properly publicized, I see no reason to believe that men will be more adept or conscientious about its use than women are about their contraceptive options.  But it’ll be one more safeguard against unplanned pregnancy and childbirth, and the first real way in which men can decide for themselves whether or not to father a child.

Create a free website or blog at